Ragados v. Office of Personnel Management

159 F. App'x 988

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ragados v. Office of Personnel Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F. App'x 917 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 23, 2005·No. No. 05-3351·Published

Opinion

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Victoriano V. Ragados moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submits a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination. We consider whether we [989]*989should vacate the court’s October 28, 2005 order dismissing Ragados’s petition for review for failure to pay the filing fee and file a Rule 15(c) statement.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Ragados’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The court’s October 28, 2005 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(8) Ragados’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Ragados’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

(2) The court’s October 28, 2005 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated.

(8) Ragados’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Ragados v. Office of Personnel Management, 159 F. App'x 988 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

159 F. App'x 988 (Ragados v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.