Rafter v. Talmadge & Co.
94 S.E. 229, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 220
This text of 94 S.E. 229 (Rafter v. Talmadge & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rafter v. Talmadge & Co., 94 S.E. 229, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 220 (Ga. 1917).
Opinion
No other verdict than that directed by the court would have been authorized under the pleadings and the evidence; and there was no error in the rulings of the court rejecting certain evidence offered, and in refusing the proposed amendment to the intervention.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Green v. Hall
108 S.E. 42 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 229, 147 Ga. 407, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafter-v-talmadge-co-ga-1917.