Rafter v. . Foltz
25 N.E. 909, 122 N.Y. 655, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1681
This text of 25 N.E. 909 (Rafter v. . Foltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rafter v. . Foltz, 25 N.E. 909, 122 N.Y. 655, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1681 (N.Y. 1890).
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Follett, Ch. J., and Yanh, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Kenney
97 F. 554 (S.D. New York, 1899)
Walton v. Rafel
28 N.Y.S. 10 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 N.E. 909, 122 N.Y. 655, 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafter-v-foltz-ny-1890.