Rafkin v. Continental Diamond Mines, Inc.
This text of 19 A.D.2d 615 (Rafkin v. Continental Diamond Mines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered on March 28, 1962, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. On this record questions of fact are present at least as to plaintiffs being holders in due course and whether the negotiation of the notes was in violation of the alleged agreement between the maker and the payee not to negotiate them so long as the pledged diamonds were in the possession of the payee. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ. [33 Misc 2d 156.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A.D.2d 615, 241 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafkin-v-continental-diamond-mines-inc-nyappdiv-1963.