Rafferty v. Schutzer
153 A. 626, 107 N.J. Eq. 613
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rafferty v. Schutzer, 153 A. 626, 107 N.J. Eq. 613 (N.J. 1931).
153 A. 626 (Rafferty v. Schutzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warfel v. Vondersmith
101 A.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Galka v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
30 A.2d 881 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Red Oaks, Inc. v. Dorez, Inc.
184 A. 746 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
Nathanson v. Wagner
179 A. 466 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Red Oaks, Inc. v. Dorez, Inc.
178 A. 554 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)