Rafferty v. Gaston
211 P. 766, 122 Wash. 699, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 701
Opinion
On Rehearing.
-This cause was reargued before the court En Banc, on December 6, 1922. Deeming ourselves fully advised in the premises, and a majority of the judges being of the opinion that the cause was correctly disposed of by the decision of Department One, reported in 118 Wash. 689, 204 Pac. 595, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons therein stated and as therein directed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rafferty v. Gaston, 211 P. 766, 122 Wash. 699, 1923 Wash. LEXIS 701 (Wash. 1923).
211 P. 766 (Rafferty v. Gaston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.
34 P.2d 428 (Washington Supreme Court, 1934)
Clark v. Parker
285 P. 652 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)
A. Leschen & Sons Rope Co. v. Case Shingle & Lumber Co.
276 P. 892 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)
Peninsula Motor Co. v. Daggett
218 P. 253 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)