Raffaele v. United States Life Insurance

266 A.D.2d 100, 698 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11651
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered January 13, 1999, which, in an action on a life insurance policy, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

An issue of fact exists as to whether the decedent’s application for life insurance, submitted four months before his death, misrepresented that he never “used cocaine, barbiturates, amphetamines or any other drug which might cause a dependency, other than as prescribed by a licensed physician”. Such issue is raised by statements in the autopsy report and death certificate that the decedent had a history of “[a]cute and chronic substance abuse” and that the cause of death was “[ijntoxication due to combined effect of opiate, ethanol and cocaine”; the proximity of the decedent’s death to the purchase of the policy; and the decedent’s family’s refusal to cooperate with defendant’s investigation and their request that an autopsy not be performed. Whether the decedent was a drug user at the time he submitted the application is a matter peculiarly within the knowledge of plaintiff, who was the decedent’s wife, and the decedent’s other family members, and a summary disposition in plaintiff’s favor would be premature at least until disclosure from her, and any other family members claiming knowledge of the decedent’s abstinence from drugs, is complete (CPLR 3212 [fl). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raffaele v. United States Life Insurance, 266 A.D.2d 100, 698 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 100 (Raffaele v. United States Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Execu/Search Group, Inc. v. Scardina
70 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)