Raff v. Raff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raff v. Raff

40 A.D.2d 783, 337 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 783 (Raff v. Raff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raff v. Raff, 40 A.D.2d 783, 337 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court of the State of New. York, New York County, entered July 17, 1970, in a proceeding under section 411 of the Family Court Act, granting petitioner’s application for a modification of the support provision for the child of the parties, and other relief, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the amount awarded for support of the child to $70 per week, and as so modified affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In light of the facts disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that the upward modification of the support ‘provision for the child was excessive and [784]*784under all the circumstances should be limited to $70 per week. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court of the State of New. York, New York County, entered July 17, 1970, in a proceeding under section 411 of the Family Court Act, granting petitioner’s application for a modification of the support provision for the child of the parties, and other relief, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the amount awarded for support of the child to $70 per week, and as so modified affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In light of the facts disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that the upward modification of the support ‘provision for the child was excessive and [784]*784under all the circumstances should be limited to $70 per week. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 783, 337 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raff-v-raff-nyappdiv-1972.