Rafeeq YaaseenibnSiddeeq v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 5, 2004
Docket07-04-00449-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Rafeeq YaaseenibnSiddeeq v. State (Rafeeq YaaseenibnSiddeeq v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rafeeq YaaseenibnSiddeeq v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NO. 07-04-0449-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 5, 2004

______________________________

RAFEEQ YAASEENIBNSIDDEEQ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 64 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. A15593-0408; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

_______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Appellant Rafeeq Yaaseenibnsiddeeq appeals from an order denying his writ of habeas corpus.  The reporter’s record is due in this cause.  An extension of the applicable deadline was sought by the court reporter.  To justify the extension, the court reporter represented that appellant has failed to submit a written designation for the record, failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record, and has been unable to contact appellant.  Though appointed an attorney at trial, nothing of record shows that appellant remained indigent and entitled to a free record on appeal.   Kahmann v. State, 873 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, pet. ref’d) (stating that establishing indigency at the time of trial does not establish indigency at the time of appeal).

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 64 th District Court of Hale County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall  immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

     1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

     2.  whether appellant is indigent; and,

     3.  whether the appellant is entitled to appointed counsel and a free appellate

record.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a supplemental reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Should it be determined that appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to an appointed attorney but has none, then the trial court shall appoint counsel, unless appellant knowingly and voluntarily waives counsel.  Furthermore, the name, address, and phone number of any counsel appointed by the trial court to represent appellant shall be included in the supplemental record.  The trial court shall also file both supplemental records with the clerk of this court on or before November 4, 2004.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then it must be requested before November 4, 2004.

     It is so ordered.

                                                                            Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard Bauder Kahmann, Jr. v. State
873 S.W.2d 785 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rafeeq YaaseenibnSiddeeq v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafeeq-yaaseenibnsiddeeq-v-state-texapp-2004.