Rafael Yee v. State of Florida

214 So. 3d 540, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2017 WL 1177638, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 711
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 30, 2017·No. SC15-1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Yee, 177 So.3d 72, 73-74 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), based on conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After hearing oral argument, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rafael Yee v. State of Florida, 214 So. 3d 540, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2017 WL 1177638, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 711 (Fla. 2017).

214 So. 3d 540 (Rafael Yee v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eduartez v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Eduartez v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n
251 So. 3d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)