Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim. Read the opinion of the Court — 715 F.3d 766
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2013·No. 11-56360·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION OCT 28 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL GONZALEZ, individually No. 11-56360 and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-04660-PA-SH

Plaintiff, ORDER and

F.E.V., a minor, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem David Vasquez; ANTOINETTE SANCHEZ, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF ANAHEIM; DARON WYATT; MATTHEW ELLIS,

Defendants - Appellees. Page 2 KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Watford did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim, (9th Cir. 2013).

Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim (Rafael Gonzalez v. City of Anaheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.