Rafael Diaz-Rodriguez v. Pamela Bondi
This text of 136 F.4th 984 (Rafael Diaz-Rodriguez v. Pamela Bondi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAFAEL DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ, No. 13-73719
Petitioner, Agency No. A093-193-920 v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, ORDER
Respondent.
Filed May 14, 2025
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo M. Callahan, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta, Daniel P. Collins, Patrick J. Bumatay, Lucy H. Koh and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ V. BONDI
SUMMARY*
Immigration
The en banc court filed an order 1) terminating en banc proceedings; 2) stating that the case remains in abeyance pending resolution of Petitioner’s motion to reopen with the Board of Immigration Appeals and that, after the abeyance is lifted, the case will be reassigned to a randomly selected three-judge panel; and 3) relinquishing priority over the question whether a conviction for child endangerment under California Penal Code § 273a(a) is “a crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) in light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).
ORDER
En banc proceedings are terminated. This case remains in abeyance pending the resolution of Petitioner’s motion to the Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen his case. After the abeyance is lifted, this case is to be reassigned to a three- judge panel that will be randomly selected. We relinquish priority over the disposition of the question whether a conviction for child endangerment under California Penal Code § 273a(a) is “a crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) in
* This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ V. BONDI 3
light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 F.4th 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafael-diaz-rodriguez-v-pamela-bondi-ca9-2025.