Rafael Burgos-Vazquez and Juan Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rafael Burgos-Vazquez and Juan Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association

193 So. 3d 23, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519, 2016 WL 1133793

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 2016

Docket4D15-2210

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 23 (Rafael Burgos-Vazquez and Juan Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rafael Burgos-Vazquez and Juan Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, 193 So. 3d 23, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519, 2016 WL 1133793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Juan Gomez, the sole defendant in the underlying foreclosure case, and Rafael Burgos-Vazquez, who has joined in the appeal despite not having been a party to the underlying action, claim to challenge an order rendered on May 7, 2015, denying Mr. Gomez’s motion to cancel the foreclosure sale. This order itself is non-final and non-appealable. Moreover, the initial brief on appeal raises issues solely addressed to the final judgment of foreclosure entered on January 5, 2009. This appeal is untimely from the final judgment. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Juan Gomez, the sole defendant in the underlying foreclosure case, and Rafael Burgos-Vazquez, who has joined in the appeal despite not having been a party to the underlying action, claim to challenge an order rendered on May 7, 2015, denying Mr. Gomez’s motion to cancel the foreclosure sale. This order itself is non-final and non-appealable. Moreover, the initial brief on appeal raises issues solely addressed to the final judgment of foreclosure entered on January 5, 2009. This appeal is untimely from the final judgment. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 3d 23, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519, 2016 WL 1133793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafael-burgos-vazquez-and-juan-gomez-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-national-fladistctapp-2016.