Rafael Bran-Sabajan v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
This text of 359 F. App'x 790 (Rafael Bran-Sabajan v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Rafael Antonio Bran-Sabajan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Hughes v. Ashcroft, 255 F.3d 752, 755 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Bran-Sabajan’s contention that he became a United States citizen pursuant to the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (“CCA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1431, is foreclosed because he was over 18 years old on the CCA’s effective date. Id. at 760.
Bran-Sabajan lacks standing to raise his constitutional challenges regarding the CCA. Because he could not meet the CCA’s requirements regardless of whether the statute applied retroactively, he has not suffered an injury that is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision of the Court. See Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Serv., Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 180-81, 120 S.Ct. 693, 145 L.Ed.2d 610 (2000).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 F. App'x 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafael-bran-sabajan-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2009.