Rafael Alfredo Montejo Luna v. State of Florida
This text of Rafael Alfredo Montejo Luna v. State of Florida (Rafael Alfredo Montejo Luna v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-2441 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CF-000016 _____________________________
RAFAEL ALFREDO MONTEJO LUNA,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hendry County. James D. Sloan, Judge.
March 27, 2026
MIZE, J.
Appellant, Rafael Alfredo Montejo Luna (“Luna”), appeals his final
judgment and sentence for second-degree murder. Luna argues that the trial court
erred by admitting evidence that Luna failed to appear at a previously agreed-upon
meeting with a law enforcement officer that was investigating the victim’s death.
The trial court found that such evidence was admissible as evidence of
consciousness of guilt, but Luna asserts that such evidence was not relevant to
show Luna’s consciousness of guilt where there was no evidence to establish that Luna was informed that the meeting was mandatory or that there would be any
potential adverse consequences to Luna for not attending the meeting. While Luna
did not make this argument in the trial court, he asserts that the trial court’s error
constituted fundamental error that can be raised for the first time on appeal.
Based on the arguments presented by Luna on appeal, we find no
fundamental error and affirm Luna’s judgment and sentence.
In the trial court, Luna argued that the evidence that he failed to appear at
the meeting with law enforcement was improper evidence of him exercising his
constitutional right to remain silent. As Luna did not make that argument on
appeal, we have not addressed it. Our affirmance of Luna’s judgment and sentence
is without prejudice for Luna to file a petition for ineffective assistance of appellate
counsel.
AFFIRMED.
WOZNIAK and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rafael Alfredo Montejo Luna v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafael-alfredo-montejo-luna-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.