Rafa El v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Rafa El v. Maryland

466 F. App'x 289

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 2012

DocketNo. 11-2172

StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 289 (Rafa El v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rafa El v. Maryland, 466 F. App'x 289 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raaj Amexem Moor Rafa El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for frivolousness. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rafa El v. Maryland, No. 1:11-cv-02611-JKB (D.Md. Sept. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Raaj Amexem Moor Rafa El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for frivolousness. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rafa El v. Maryland, No. 1:11-cv-02611-JKB (D.Md. Sept. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 F. App'x 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rafa-el-v-maryland-ca4-2012.