R.A.F. v. J.S.G.

545 N.E.2d 564, 1989 Ind. LEXIS 318
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 20, 1989
DocketNo. 02S04-8910-CV-789
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 545 N.E.2d 564 (R.A.F. v. J.S.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.A.F. v. J.S.G., 545 N.E.2d 564, 1989 Ind. LEXIS 318 (Ind. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the verdict of a jury, the trial court entered judgment finding that R.A.F. was the father of K.G. R.A.F. appealed, asserting several errors, including the erroneous admission of certain evidence. The Court of Appeals reversed. In re Paternity of K.G. (1989), Ind.App., 536 N.E.2d 1033.

Appellee J.8.G., the mother, seeks transfer, asserting that the cause should be remanded for a new trial. We conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly reversed the judgment of the trial court and that J.S.G. is entitled to a new trial.

Accordingly, we grant appellee's petition to transfer and adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3), Ind. Rules of Procedure. The cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, GIVAN, PIVARNIK and DICKSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mundy v. Angelicchio
623 N.E.2d 456 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
Jordan v. Deery
609 N.E.2d 1104 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 N.E.2d 564, 1989 Ind. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raf-v-jsg-ind-1989.