R.A.F. General Partnership v. Division of Tax Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

R.A.F. General Partnership v. Division of Tax Appeals

206 A.D.2d 572, 614 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7229

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 A.D.2d 572 (R.A.F. General Partnership v. Division of Tax Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.A.F. General Partnership v. Division of Tax Appeals, 206 A.D.2d 572, 614 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Tax Law § 2016) to review a determination of respondent Division of Tax Appeals which imposed a real property transfer gains tax assessment under Tax Law article 31-B.

In our view, the petition must be dismissed due to petitioner’s failure to exhaust its administrative remedies. There is no dispute that this matter is still pending before the Administrative Law Judge and a final decision of the Tax Appeals Tribunal has yet to be rendered. Because Tax Law § 2016 only permits judicial review of final determinations of the Tax Appeals Tribunal, petitioner’s challenges are not properly before this Court. Petitioner’s argument that it has presented valid exceptions to the requirement of exhaustion have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Tax Law § 2016) to review a determination of respondent Division of Tax Appeals which imposed a real property transfer gains tax assessment under Tax Law article 31-B.

In our view, the petition must be dismissed due to petitioner’s failure to exhaust its administrative remedies. There is no dispute that this matter is still pending before the Administrative Law Judge and a final decision of the Tax Appeals Tribunal has yet to be rendered. Because Tax Law § 2016 only permits judicial review of final determinations of the Tax Appeals Tribunal, petitioner’s challenges are not properly before this Court. Petitioner’s argument that it has presented valid exceptions to the requirement of exhaustion have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 572, 614 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raf-general-partnership-v-division-of-tax-appeals-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack