Raeuber v. Public Service Railway Co.
98 A. 192, 89 N.J.L. 366, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 330
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[368]*368For affirmance—-The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, White, Terhune, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 12.
For reversal—Kalisch, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raeuber v. Public Service Railway Co., 98 A. 192, 89 N.J.L. 366, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1916).
98 A. 192 (Raeuber v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. Public Service Coordinated Transport
65 A.2d 636 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)