Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales
594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 988, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1249
This text of 594 N.E.2d 928 (Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales, 594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 988, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1249 (N.Y. 1992).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Respondent’s refusal to enroll petitioner as a participating provider was not arbitrary or capricious (see, 18 NYCRR 504.5; see also, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales
181 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 988, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raes-pharmacy-inc-v-perales-ny-1992.