Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales
594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 988, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1249
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Respondent’s refusal to enroll petitioner as a participating provider was not arbitrary or capricious (see, 18 NYCRR 504.5; see also, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales, 594 N.E.2d 928, 79 N.Y.2d 988, 584 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1249 (N.Y. 1992).
594 N.E.2d 928 (Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. Perales
181 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)