Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano

54 A.D.2d 587, 387 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 587 (Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano, 54 A.D.2d 587, 387 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action against the guarantors of a promissory note, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 21, 1976, which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the first affirmative defense contained in the answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Neither the doctrine of res judicata nor the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable here. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against the guarantors of a promissory note, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 21, 1976, which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the first affirmative defense contained in the answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Neither the doctrine of res judicata nor the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable here. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 587, 387 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rael-automatic-sprinkler-co-v-rosano-nyappdiv-1976.