Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano

54 A.D.2d 587, 387 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1976·Published

Opinion

In an action against the guarantors of a promissory note, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 21, 1976, which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the first affirmative defense contained in the answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Neither the doctrine of res judicata nor the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable here. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against the guarantors of a promissory note, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 21, 1976, which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the first affirmative defense contained in the answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Neither the doctrine of res judicata nor the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable here. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano, 54 A.D.2d 587, 387 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 587 (Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Rosano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.