Raeder v. New York Times Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Raeder v. New York Times Co.

12 A.D.2d 977, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 977 (Raeder v. New York Times Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Raeder v. New York Times Co., 12 A.D.2d 977, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages allegedly caused by wrongful and malicious acts in consummation of a plan or conspiracy to destroy plaintiff’s television show “ Creative Frontiers,” plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 30, 1959, as grants defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint for patent insufficiency, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages allegedly caused by wrongful and malicious acts in consummation of a plan or conspiracy to destroy plaintiff’s television show “ Creative Frontiers,” plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 30, 1959, as grants defendants’ motion for judgment dismissing the complaint for patent insufficiency, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to serve an amended complaint is extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 977, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raeder-v-new-york-times-co-nyappdiv-1961.