Rae v. PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rae v. PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION

951 A.2d 256, 597 Pa. 220, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 887

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 11, 2008·No. Petition 517 MAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is set forth below:

Must an appellate court separately apply the collateral order test laid out in Pa.R.A.P. 313 and this Court’s decision in Ben v. Schwartz, 556 Pa. 475, 729 A.2d 547 (1999), to every legal question it addresses on collateral appeal, or is it sufficient that the legal question giving rise to the order itself satisfies the collateral order test?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is set forth below:

Must an appellate court separately apply the collateral order test laid out in Pa.R.A.P. 313 and this Court’s decision in Ben v. Schwartz, 556 Pa. 475, 729 A.2d 547 (1999), to every legal question it addresses on collateral appeal, or is it sufficient that the legal question giving rise to the order itself satisfies the collateral order test?

Rae v. PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 951 A.2d 256, 597 Pa. 220, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 887 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

951 A.2d 256 (Rae v. PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related