Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co

53 N.E. 220, 178 Ill. 369
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 1899·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The elaborate and able argument for appellants can not be considered on what appears from this record, as the decree does not find or require judgment in any particular kind of money, but finds a sum due in dollars and cents. Even if it were assumed that contracts of this character could not be sustained, still, by the final decree the appellants are not prejudiced,—they cannot be heard to complain in an appellate tribunal. If the character of monejT' in which payment is contracted to be made be rejected from the contract, still the liability for payment in some kind of legal tender would exist, hence by the decree no prejudice resulted to appellants in overruling their demurrer.

The decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co, 53 N.E. 220, 178 Ill. 369 (Ill. 1899).

53 N.E. 220 (Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorr v. Hunter
56 N.E. 159 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Dorr v. Hunter
83 Ill. App. 334 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)