Radu v. Shon

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Bogdan Radu, No. CV-20-00246-TUC-RM

10 Petitioner, ORDER

11 v.

12 Persephone Johnson Shon,

13 Respondent. 14 15 On August 22, 2022, this Court granted Petitioner Bogdan Radu’s Petition for 16 Return of Children to Germany pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of 17 International Child Abduction, and ordered Respondent Persephone Johnson Shon to 18 return minors M.S.R. and O.S.R. to Germany. (Doc. 112 (“Return Order”).) Respondent 19 filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 114), and the Court temporarily stayed the Return Order 20 pending the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ resolution of a motion to stay filed in that 21 Court (Doc. 120). 22 On March 13, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed a decision affirming 23 this Court’s Return Order and denying as moot Respondent’s motion to stay the Return 24 Order. (Doc. 126-1.) The Ninth Circuit issued its mandate on April 4, 2023. (Doc. 126.) 25 On March 15, 2023 and April 4, 2023, Respondent filed Status Reports in which 26 she asks this Court to keep its temporary stay of the Return Order in place until the 27 United States Supreme Court rules on an application for a stay. (Docs. 124, 125.) 28 In considering whether to stay a return order in a Hague Convention case, courts 1 || consider the traditional stay factors: “(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong 2|| showing that [s]he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be || irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.” || Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U.S. 165, 179 (2013). 6 The Court does not find that the above factors weigh in favor of continuing a stay 7\| of the Return Order. Although Respondent may suffer some hardship as a result of being 8 || required to return to Germany with O.S.R. and M.S.R., that potential hardship does not □□ outweigh the other factors, all of which favor lifting the stay. First, Respondent has not || shown a likelihood of success on the merits of a petition for writ of certiorari filed in the 11 |} United States Supreme Court. Second, the public interest favors the prompt return of || wrongfully removed children, see Chafin, 586 U.S. at 178, and this case has already been 13 || pending for nearly three years. Finally, continuation of the stay would substantially injure Petitioner, who has joint custody rights with Respondent under German law but 15 || has been unable to see his children for years due to Respondent’s conduct. 16 Accordingly, 17 IT IS ORDERED that the temporary stay (Doc. 120) of the Court’s Return Order 18 || is lifted. Respondent Persephone Johnson Shon shall return with minor children O.S.R. 19|| and M.S.R. to Germany within sixty (60) days of the date this Order is filed. 20 Dated this 6th day of April, 2023. 21 22 23 □□ □ Honorable Rosemary □□□□□□□ 25 United States District □□□□□ 26 27 28

_2-