Radtke v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.

114 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 375, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 492, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3057
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1940
DocketNo. 7577
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 F.2d 15 (Radtke v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radtke v. American Tri-Ergon Corp., 114 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 375, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 492, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3057 (D.C. Cir. 1940).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard on appellants’ motion filed on January 27, 1940, for temporary injunction to enjoin appellee Commissioner of Patents from issuing a patent as directed by the order of the District Court entered in this cause on January 24, 1940, and it appearing that said order of January 24, 1940, was entered by the District Court after an appeal to this court in the cause had been taken and perfected and after this court had obtained exclusive jurisdiction of the cause, see Lasier v. Lasier, 47 App.D.C. 80; Keyser v. Farr, 105 U.S. 265, 26 L.Ed. 1025, it is, therefore, ordered that, pending final determination of the appeal in this cause, or the further order of this court, said order of January 24, 1940, be, and it is hereby, stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Switzer v. Marzall
95 F. Supp. 721 (District of Columbia, 1951)
Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
61 F. Supp. 925 (D. Delaware, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 375, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 492, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radtke-v-american-tri-ergon-corp-cadc-1940.