Radtke Brothers Kortsch Co. v. Industrial Comm.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Radtke Brothers Kortsch Co. v. Industrial Comm.

6 N.W.2d 679, 240 Wis. 410, 1942 Wisc. LEXIS 115

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Wicichem, and the writer are of opinion that the facts in the record support the conclusions and award of the Industrial Commission and that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. *411 Justice Martin are of contrary view and of opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Under the rule the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fairchild, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Wicichem, and the writer are of opinion that the facts in the record support the conclusions and award of the Industrial Commission and that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Fowler, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. *411 Justice Martin are of contrary view and of opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Under the rule the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Radtke Brothers Kortsch Co. v. Industrial Comm., 6 N.W.2d 679, 240 Wis. 410, 1942 Wisc. LEXIS 115 (Wis. 1942).

Pincite

6 N.W.2d 679 (Radtke Brothers Kortsch Co. v. Industrial Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related