Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Radon v. State

Radon v. State

144 A.D.2d 924, 535 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14380
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1988·No. Claim No. 73049·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We recognize that there is a policy of liberal and full disclosure to be applied to discovery requests pursuant to CPLR 3101 (a) (see, Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 NY2d 403; Jonmaire v Town of W. Seneca, 120 AD2d 928; Wiseman v American Motors Sales Corp., 103 AD2d 230, 237; Klatz v Armor Elevator Co., 93 AD2d 633). However, in the circumstances of this case, the court should make an in camera inspection of the [925] records and determine what portion of the records, if any, is material and necessary to the prosecution of the issues. (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, McMahon, J. — discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Law-ton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radon v. State, 144 A.D.2d 924, 535 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

144 A.D.2d 924 (Radon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.
235 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Klatz v. Armor Elevator Co.
93 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Wiseman v. American Motors Sales Corp.
103 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Jonmaire v. Town of West Seneca
120 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)