Radnitz v. Electric Power & Light Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Radnitz v. Electric Power & Light Corp.

259 A.D. 867, 20 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7038

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 867 (Radnitz v. Electric Power & Light Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radnitz v. Electric Power & Light Corp., 259 A.D. 867, 20 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

The record presents an issue of fact which cannot be determined on a motion for summary judgment concerning the meaning to be attributed to the option warrants. Judgment reversed, without costs, and the order, to the extent that it denies the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, affirmed and, to the extent that it grants the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed and the cross-motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The record presents an issue of fact which cannot be determined on a motion for summary judgment concerning the meaning to be attributed to the option warrants. Judgment reversed, without costs, and the order, to the extent that it denies the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, affirmed and, to the extent that it grants the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed and the cross-motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 867, 20 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radnitz-v-electric-power-light-corp-nyappdiv-1940.