Radloff v. Radloff

207 Ill. App. 572
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 24, 1917·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Appeal and ebbob, § 812* — how language used in argument of counsel must he preserved in hill of exceptions. Language claimed to have been used in opening and closing arguments of counsel and excepted to cannot be preserved in the record by inclusion in the argument of a motion for a new trial, but the bill of exceptions must set forth the language used in its proper place before such, exception can be considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radloff v. Radloff, 207 Ill. App. 572 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

207 Ill. App. 572 (Radloff v. Radloff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.