Radley v. Brice

6 Wend. 539
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 1831·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

A plaintiff is entitled to recover costs in all actions in which the title to lands or tenements, or a right of way, or a right by proscription or otherwise, to any easement in any lands, or to overflow the same, or to do any other injury thereto, shall have been put in issue by the pleadings, or shall have come in question on the trial of the cause.” 2 R. S. 613, § 3. A notice of justification subjoined to the general issue in an action of trespass is equivalent to a special plea, and as effectually puts the title in is[540] sue; the rights of the plaintiff in this case, therefore, are the game ag jf the matter set forth in the notice had been spread out in a plea. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radley v. Brice, 6 Wend. 539 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

6 Wend. 539 (Radley v. Brice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Daigler
3 N.Y.S. 718 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Crowell v. Smith
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Crossman v. Lander
3 Or. 495 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1869)
Burnet v. Kelly
10 How. Pr. 406 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
People ex rel. Fryer v. New-York Common Pleas
18 Wend. 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)