Radley v. Brice

6 Wend. 539
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 9, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 539 (Radley v. Brice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radley v. Brice, 6 Wend. 539 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

A plaintiff is entitled to recover costs in all actions in which the title to lands or tenements, or a right of way, or a right by proscription or otherwise, to any easement in any lands, or to overflow the same, or to do any other injury thereto, shall have been put in issue by the pleadings, or shall have come in question on the trial of the cause.” 2 R. S. 613, § 3. A notice of justification subjoined to the general issue in an action of trespass is equivalent to a special plea, and as effectually puts the title in is[540]*540sue; the rights of the plaintiff in this case, therefore, are the game ag jf the matter set forth in the notice had been spread out in a plea. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Daigler
3 N.Y.S. 718 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Crowell v. Smith
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Crossman v. Lander
3 Or. 495 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1869)
Burnet v. Kelly
10 How. Pr. 406 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
People ex rel. Fryer v. New-York Common Pleas
18 Wend. 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Wend. 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radley-v-brice-nysupct-1831.