Radio System, Inc. v. Sutton Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Radio System, Inc. v. Sutton Associates, Inc.

49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11044

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 862 (Radio System, Inc. v. Sutton Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radio System, Inc. v. Sutton Associates, Inc., 49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on June 9, 1975 granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and related relief unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiff-[863]*863respondent. On this record, although Special Term was in error in stating that the tenant could have passed any increases on to the subtenant if the appraisal under the prime lease had been prompt, the preliminary injunction was proper. It has the effect of staying a procedure in the nature of arbitration in which the plaintiff cannot participate without waiving its objections to that procedure, and we affirm for the reasons, except as noted, stated by Mr. Justice Helman at Special Term. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on June 9, 1975 granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and related relief unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiff-[863]*863respondent. On this record, although Special Term was in error in stating that the tenant could have passed any increases on to the subtenant if the appraisal under the prime lease had been prompt, the preliminary injunction was proper. It has the effect of staying a procedure in the nature of arbitration in which the plaintiff cannot participate without waiving its objections to that procedure, and we affirm for the reasons, except as noted, stated by Mr. Justice Helman at Special Term. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 862, 374 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radio-system-inc-v-sutton-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1975.