Radio Shoppe, Inc. v. Thompson

122 So. 909, 10 La. App. 742, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 177
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 29, 1929
DocketNo. 11,818
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 122 So. 909 (Radio Shoppe, Inc. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radio Shoppe, Inc. v. Thompson, 122 So. 909, 10 La. App. 742, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 177 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit on a series of promissory notes aggregating 1103.50. The notes were given in part payment of the purchase price of a certain radio, sold by plaintiff and bought by defendant. The defense is a failure of consideration based upon the allegation that the radio did not operate satisfactorily.

There was judgment below for plaintiff, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

The evidence indicates that the radio was installed by the defendant who attached “aerial and leading wires.” We are convinced that, as thus installed, it did not function properly. Nevertheless, plaintiff displayed a willingness, at all times, to make proper repairs, finally offering to furnish an entirely new outfit, which was declined by defendant upon the ground that he desired a new box or casing as well as , the radio itself, and this, the plaintiff was unwilling to supply.

[743]*743We agree with the trial judge in his finding that the defendant was not justified in rejecting the radio or imposing unreasonable demands upon plaintiff as a condition of its acceptance. The radio, which was sold, is shown to be recognized by the trade as a first-class instrument and there is testimony to the effect that all radios occasionally give trouble.

Under the circumstances and for the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sholes v. Continental Casualty Company
196 So. 2d 680 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)
Leon v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
55 N.E.2d 557 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
Thomas v. First Nat. Life, Health & Accident Ins. Co.
157 So. 409 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
A. Baldwin & Co. v. Wall
138 So. 442 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 909, 10 La. App. 742, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radio-shoppe-inc-v-thompson-lactapp-1929.