Radio-Electronics Officers Union v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Exxon Communications Company, American Institute of Merchant Shipping, Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., Intervenors

895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2251
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1990
Docket89-1248
StatusUnpublished

This text of 895 F.2d 809 (Radio-Electronics Officers Union v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Exxon Communications Company, American Institute of Merchant Shipping, Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., Intervenors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radio-Electronics Officers Union v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Exxon Communications Company, American Institute of Merchant Shipping, Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., Intervenors, 895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2251 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

895 F.2d 809

282 U.S.App.D.C. 404

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
RADIO-ELECTRONICS OFFICERS UNION, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America,
Exxon Communications Company, American Institute of Merchant
Shipping, Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc., Intervenors.

No. 89-1248.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1990.

Before RUTH B. GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This petition was considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The court, after full review of the case, is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the petition does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). Substantially for the reasons stated in the Commission's initial decision, released July 5, 1988, and denial of reconsideration, released February 13, 1989, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Commission's order granting exemptions be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Davis (Dwight I.)
895 F.2d 809 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 F.2d 809, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radio-electronics-officers-union-v-federal-communications-commission-and-cadc-1990.