Radin v. Paul

90 N.Y.S. 1072
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1072 (Radin v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radin v. Paul, 90 N.Y.S. 1072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The stipulation upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain the judgment concedes every question of fact in favor of" the plaintiffs that was disputed and contested upon the trial. The defendant, by this stipulation, admitting as he does that the 21 pieces of goods, the value of which the action was brought to recover, were never returned to the plaintiff, alleged errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence sought to be brought out by the defendant on the question of the number of pieces returned become valueless as grounds for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radin-v-paul-nyappterm-1904.