Radin v. Paul
This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1072 (Radin v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The stipulation upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain the judgment concedes every question of fact in favor of" the plaintiffs that was disputed and contested upon the trial. The defendant, by this stipulation, admitting as he does that the 21 pieces of goods, the value of which the action was brought to recover, were never returned to the plaintiff, alleged errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence sought to be brought out by the defendant on the question of the number of pieces returned become valueless as grounds for reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 N.Y.S. 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radin-v-paul-nyappterm-1904.