Radin v. Paul

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Radin v. Paul

90 N.Y.S. 1072

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 7, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The stipulation upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain the judgment concedes every question of fact in favor of" the plaintiffs that was disputed and contested upon the trial. The defendant, by this stipulation, admitting as he does that the 21 pieces of goods, the value of which the action was brought to recover, were never returned to the plaintiff, alleged errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence sought to be brought out by the defendant on the question of the number of pieces returned become valueless as grounds for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The stipulation upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain the judgment concedes every question of fact in favor of" the plaintiffs that was disputed and contested upon the trial. The defendant, by this stipulation, admitting as he does that the 21 pieces of goods, the value of which the action was brought to recover, were never returned to the plaintiff, alleged errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence sought to be brought out by the defendant on the question of the number of pieces returned become valueless as grounds for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Radin v. Paul, 90 N.Y.S. 1072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 1072 (Radin v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.