Radilla-Juarez v. Gonzales
This text of 172 F. App'x 212 (Radilla-Juarez v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Radilla-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
Radilla-Juarez contends that due process required the IJ to continue his removal proceedings until after Radilla-Juarez’s parents’ applications for cancellation of removal were adjudicated. We are without jurisdiction to review this argument because Radilla-Juarez failed to raise it before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radilla-juarez-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.