Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A. v. Trostle

822 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10894, 2002 WL 1769007
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 2002
DocketNo. 5D02-856
StatusPublished

This text of 822 So. 2d 574 (Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A. v. Trostle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A. v. Trostle, 822 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10894, 2002 WL 1769007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PLEUS,'J.

Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A., one of the defendants in a medical malpractice action, seeks certiorari review of an order denying an emergency motion for stay and an order which severed one of the other defendants from the action.

Dennis and Ann Trostle filed a medical malpractice action against two doctors and their professional associations, alleging the negligent implantation of radiation seeds in Mr. Trostle’s prostate gland. One of the defendant doctors, Dr. Daniel Halili, M.D., purchased professional liability insurance through an insurance carrier which later became insolvent. When the insurance carrier was declared insolvent and an order of liquidation was entered, both Dr) Halili and his employer, Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A., filed emergency motions for stay of the medical malpractice action pursuant to the automatic stay provision of section 631.67, Florida Statutes (2001). The trial court by written order denied Radiation Oncology Consultants’ motion for stay, and entered an order which severed Dr. Halili from the action. Both Dr. Halili and Radiation Oncology Consultants filed separate petitions for writ of certiorari.

In Halili v. Radiation Oncology Consultants, P.A., 820 So.2d 415 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), this court quashed the order which denied Radiation Oncology Consultants’ motion for stay, and also quashed the order which severed Dr. Halili from the action. As the two orders which are the subject of the instant petition have been quashed, this proceeding is moot.

' PETITION DENIED AS MOOT.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halili v. RADIATION ONCOLOGY CONSULT., PA
820 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 So. 2d 574, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10894, 2002 WL 1769007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radiation-oncology-consultants-pa-v-trostle-fladistctapp-2002.