Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC v. Philip B. Sauer

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 16, 2013·No. 05-13-00573-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 16, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00573-CV

RADIANT DARKSTAR PRODUCTION, LLC, Appellant V.

PHILIP B. SAUER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02152

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang

This is an appeal from the trial court’s April 4, 2013 order overruling Radiant Darkstar

Productions, LLC’s motion to dissolve prejudgment writs of garnishment and emergency motion to release funds deposited in the registry of the court. Because it appeared these interlocutory orders were unappealable, we directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. See In re Tex. Am. Express, Inc., 190 S.W.3d 720, 727 (Tex. App.—2005, orig. proceeding) (“As a general rule, writs and orders issued to aid judgment creditors in collecting on their judgments are not appealable.”). In its letter brief, Radiant Darkstar stated it had also filed a petition for writ of mandamus and had brought the appeal “in an abundance of caution” in the event certain portions of the challenged orders were determined to be injunctive in nature. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2012) (allowing appeal from interlocutory order of district court granting or refusing a temporary injunction or granting

or overruling a motion to dissolve temporary injunction). By opinion filed June 25, 2013, the Court conditionally granted Darkstar’s petition for writ of mandamus, specifically finding Darkstar has no adequate remedy at law. See In re Radiant Darkstar Prod., L.L.C., 05-13- 00586-CV, 2013 WL 3239672 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 25, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Because the complained of orders are unappealable interlocutory orders and in light of this Court’s June 25th opinion, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Tex. Am. Express, 190 S.W.3d at 727.

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE

130573F.P05

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

RADIANT DARKSTAR PRODUCTION, On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District LLC, Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02152.

No. 05-13-00573-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices Myers and Evans participating.

PHILIP B. SAUER, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Philip B. Sauer recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC.

Judgment entered this 16th day of July, 2013.

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC v. Philip B. Sauer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC v. Philip B. Sauer (Radiant Darkstar Production, LLC v. Philip B. Sauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Texas American Express, Inc.
190 S.W.3d 720 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)