Radford's Executors v. Innes's

1 Va. 8
Virginia Chancery Court·Decided September 23, 1806·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The reasons assigned for a continuance are not sufficient to induce the Court to depart from the general rule; and that is, never to continue a motion for the dissolution of an injunction, unless from some very great necessity, because the Court is always open to grant, and, of course, to reinstate an injunction, whenever it shall appear proper to do so, and because too the plaintiff should always be ready to prove his bill. The injunction must be dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Radford's Executors v. Innes's, 1 Va. 8 (Va. Super. Ct. 1806).

1 Va. 8 (Radford's Executors v. Innes's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.