Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Radford v. Hill

Radford v. Hill

135 P.3d 397, 205 Or. App. 683, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 618
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 10, 2006
Docket05-03-4283M; A128982
StatusPublished

This text of 135 P.3d 397 (Radford v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radford v. Hill, 135 P.3d 397, 205 Or. App. 683, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 618 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Lutz v. Hill, 205 Or App 252, 134 P3d 1003 (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lutz v. Hill
134 P.3d 1003 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 P.3d 397, 205 Or. App. 683, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radford-v-hill-orctapp-2006.