Rader v. Regional Transit Authority

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rader v. Regional Transit Authority

595 So. 2d 644, 1992 La. LEXIS 1268, 1992 WL 69514

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 3, 1992

DocketNo. 92-CC-0371

StatusPublished

This text of 595 So. 2d 644 (Rader v. Regional Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rader v. Regional Transit Authority, 595 So. 2d 644, 1992 La. LEXIS 1268, 1992 WL 69514 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Rader, Gena; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-10535; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91CW-2781.

Granted. Trial judge correctly denied discovery of RTA’s internal evaluation as to whether the accident was “preventable” and any post-accident disciplinary action taken against the driver. However, the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to conduct an in-camera inspection of the subject documents and to order disclosure of any containing relevant evidence or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. See Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So.2d 953 (La.1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rader, Gena; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E”, No. 91-10535; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91CW-2781.

Granted. Trial judge correctly denied discovery of RTA’s internal evaluation as to whether the accident was “preventable” and any post-accident disciplinary action taken against the driver. However, the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to conduct an in-camera inspection of the subject documents and to order disclosure of any containing relevant evidence or likely to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. See Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So.2d 953 (La.1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

595 So. 2d 644, 1992 La. LEXIS 1268, 1992 WL 69514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rader-v-regional-transit-authority-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack