Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

Second Circuit

Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

255 F.2d 404

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1958

DocketNo. 259, Docket 24928

StatusPublished

This text of 255 F.2d 404 (Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia, 255 F.2d 404 (2d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While the allegations of the lengthy complaint herein are not over-clear, it is quite apparent that plaintiffs are once more seeking to evade responsibility for the bail bond indemnity to which they have been held in a series of actions that they have initiated in the state and federal courts. These are fully described, with citations, in our latest decision, Rader v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, 2 Cir., 242 F.2d 419, of which, and the record on which it was based, we take judicial notice. There is no excuse for these many attempts to reopen issues thoroughly settled and now completely res judicata,. We modify the judgment to provide for dismissal of the complaint on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While the allegations of the lengthy complaint herein are not over-clear, it is quite apparent that plaintiffs are once more seeking to evade responsibility for the bail bond indemnity to which they have been held in a series of actions that they have initiated in the state and federal courts. These are fully described, with citations, in our latest decision, Rader v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, 2 Cir., 242 F.2d 419, of which, and the record on which it was based, we take judicial notice. There is no excuse for these many attempts to reopen issues thoroughly settled and now completely res judicata,. We modify the judgment to provide for dismissal of the complaint on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 F.2d 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rader-v-manufacturers-casualty-insurance-co-of-philadelphia-ca2-1958.