Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

255 F.2d 404
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 F.2d 419
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 20, 1958·No. No. 259, Docket 24928·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While the allegations of the lengthy complaint herein are not over-clear, it is quite apparent that plaintiffs are once more seeking to evade responsibility for the bail bond indemnity to which they have been held in a series of actions that they have initiated in the state and federal courts. These are fully described, with citations, in our latest decision, Rader v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, 2 Cir., 242 F.2d 419, of which, and the record on which it was based, we take judicial notice. There is no excuse for these many attempts to reopen issues thoroughly settled and now completely res judicata,. We modify the judgment to provide for dismissal of the complaint on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia, 255 F.2d 404 (2d Cir. 1958).

255 F.2d 404 (Rader v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.