Radeline v. Gruenberg

Fourth Circuit

Radeline v. Gruenberg

671 F. App'x 169

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2016·No. No. 16-1416·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christine F. Radeline appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her employer in Radeline’s civil action alleging sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Radeline v. Gruenberg, No. 1:15-cv-00957-CMH-JFA, 2016 WL 1271037 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2016 & entered Mar. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christine F. Radeline appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her employer in Radeline’s civil action alleging sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Radeline v. Gruenberg, No. 1:15-cv-00957-CMH-JFA, 2016 WL 1271037 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2016 & entered Mar. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Radeline v. Gruenberg, 671 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 169 (Radeline v. Gruenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.