Radeker v. . Royal Pines Park, Inc.

176 S.E. 285, 207 N.C. 209, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 10, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 176 S.E. 285 (Radeker v. . Royal Pines Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radeker v. . Royal Pines Park, Inc., 176 S.E. 285, 207 N.C. 209, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 421 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

Tbe judge of tbe general county court of Buncombe, “after bearing evidence for plaintiff and movants, and .argument of counsel,” found tbe facts, and upon tbe facts so found held, “in its discretion and as a matter of law, . . . that tbe movants have shown excusable neglect and a meritorious defense,” and adjudged that tbe default judgment and tbe proceedings pursuant thereto', be “declared null and void and set aside.”

No evidence appears in tbe case on appeal, unless tbe pleadings, tbe judgment sought to be set aside and tbe record incident thereto, and tbe motion and affidavit of tbe movants be treated as evidence. If these be so treated, they furnish sufficient basis for tbe findings of fact. If they be not so treated, then, in tbe absence of tbe evidence from tbe case on appeal, tbe findings of fact are presumed to be based upon sufficient evidence. And withal there are no exceptions to tbe findings of facts. These findings are final and binding upon tbis Court.

Tbe findings of fact fully sustain bis Honor’s bolding that tbe movants have shown excusable neglect and meritorious defense. In no view of tbe case, therefore, should tbe judgment be reversed. Abbitt v. Gregory, 195 N. C., 203; Bank v. Duke, 187 N. C., 386; Weil v. Woodard, 104 N. C., 94.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Discharge of Burris Ex Rel. City Manager
135 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.
65 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Carter v. Carter
61 S.E.2d 711 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Hughes v. . Oliver
47 S.E.2d 6 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 285, 207 N.C. 209, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radeker-v-royal-pines-park-inc-nc-1934.