Radebaugh v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Radebaugh v. Wolfe

47 P. 1101, 5 Okla. 147

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 12, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 P. 1101 (Radebaugh v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radebaugh v. Wolfe, 47 P. 1101, 5 Okla. 147 (Okla. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an action instituted by William Wolfe, plaintiff in the court below, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to obtain a mandatory injunction removing the defendant below, Samuel S. Radebaugh, from a certain quarter section of land. This case is in all respects similar to the Woodruff-Wallace case, (3 Okla. 355), and the decision of the lower court was in harmony with the decision therein, and that case must control in the one under consideration. Upon the authority of Woodruff v. Wallace, supra, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is an action instituted by William Wolfe, plaintiff in the court below, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to obtain a mandatory injunction removing the defendant below, Samuel S. Radebaugh, from a certain quarter section of land. This case is in all respects similar to the Woodruff-Wallace case, (3 Okla. 355), and the decision of the lower court was in harmony with the decision therein, and that case must control in the one under consideration. Upon the authority of Woodruff v. Wallace, supra, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 P. 1101, 5 Okla. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radebaugh-v-wolfe-okla-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack