Radcliffe v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

984 So. 2d 1268, 2008 WL 2512495
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2008
Docket4D08-1125
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 984 So. 2d 1268 (Radcliffe v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radcliffe v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 984 So. 2d 1268, 2008 WL 2512495 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

984 So.2d 1268 (2008)

Desmond RADCLIFFE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Sophia N. Chambers, Appellee.

No. 4D08-1125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 2008.

Desmond Radcliffe, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On appellee's confession of error that there is insufficient evidence to support the award of child support, we reverse and remand for entry of a new proposed administrative support order and, if no timely request for an administrative hearing is made, the entry of a final administrative support order.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cornelius v. State
984 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 So. 2d 1268, 2008 WL 2512495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radcliffe-v-state-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2008.