Radcliff v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Radcliff v. State

200 S.E. 812, 59 Ga. App. 335, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 8

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 17, 1939·No. 27270·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors which did not have thereon the revenue stamp of the State of Georgia, as required by law. The verdict was demanded by the evidence and the defendant’s statement to the jury; and the special grounds of the motion for new trial show no cause for another hearing of the, case. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors which did not have thereon the revenue stamp of the State of Georgia, as required by law. The verdict was demanded by the evidence and the defendant’s statement to the jury; and the special grounds of the motion for new trial show no cause for another hearing of the, case. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Radcliff v. State, 200 S.E. 812, 59 Ga. App. 335, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 8 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

200 S.E. 812 (Radcliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.