Radcliff v. Nelson

3 So. 3d 304, 2006 WL 6201764
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedDecember 29, 2006
Docket2060053
StatusPublished

This text of 3 So. 3d 304 (Radcliff v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Radcliff v. Nelson, 3 So. 3d 304, 2006 WL 6201764 (Ala. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

3 So.3d 304 (2006)

VIVIAN RADCLIFF, BRUCE ZIRLOTT, ANNA NEELEY, KENNETH ZIRLOTT, CAROLYN GARDNER, CATHY Z. PEEK, MINDA Z. SCHJOTT, CARLTON ZIRLOTT, BRADLEY ZIRLOTT, MATHEW ZIRLOTT, AND MARILYN BOSARGE
v.
BRENDA Z. NELSON.

No. 2060053.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 29, 2006.

Decision of the alabama court of civil appeals without opinion. Dismissed on motion of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 So. 3d 304, 2006 WL 6201764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radcliff-v-nelson-alacivapp-2006.