Radcliff v. Meishberger
This text of 43 N.E.2d 874 (Radcliff v. Meishberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*136 *135 The only questions herein presented require an examination of the evidence and that *136 is not. before us. The document attached to the transcript which purports to be an original bill of exceptions containing the evidence is inserted in the transcript after the clerk’s certificate, is not certified by that official and is therefore not a part of the record. Pahmeier v. Rogers (1936), 102 Ind. App. 480, 1 N. E. (2d) 287; Mercantile Discount Corp. v. Clark (1922), 78 Ind. App. 313, 135 N. E. 490.
On August 31, 1942, the appellant filed a petition in this court praying that this court issue an order to the clerk of' Hancock Circuit Court directing and commanding him to certify to this court the original bill of exceptions containing the evidence filed in the trial court. The record discloses that appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled May 8, 1942. Therefore his time for taking an appeal expired on August 6, 1942. His petition for an order to the clerk to correct the transcript, coming after the time for appeal has expired, is too late. Pahmeier v. Rogers, supra.
Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 43 N. E. (2d) 874.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 N.E.2d 874, 112 Ind. App. 135, 1942 Ind. App. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radcliff-v-meishberger-indctapp-1942.