Radcliff v. Marine Insurance Co.

New York Supreme Court

Radcliff v. Marine Insurance Co.

3 Cai. Cas. 106, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 461

DecidedMay 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 106 (Radcliff v. Marine Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Radcliff v. Marine Insurance Co., 3 Cai. Cas. 106, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 461 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

THESE points Were ruled. 1st, A judge may grant and annul his own order to stayproceedings on a case made, as well in term as in vacation, and this, though a rule for judgment be entered ; the decision in Shephard ads. Case, Cole. 90, applying to judgments perfected. 2d. If a judge has granted an order to stay proceedings on a case made, on account of an improper item allowed by a jury, and be declare this to have been his only reason, the court may, on such item being relinquished, vacate the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THESE points Were ruled. 1st, A judge may grant and annul his own order to stayproceedings on a case made, as well in term as in vacation, and this, though a rule for judgment be entered ; the decision in Shephard ads. Case, Cole. 90, applying to judgments perfected. 2d. If a judge has granted an order to stay proceedings on a case made, on account of an improper item allowed by a jury, and be declare this to have been his only reason, the court may, on such item being relinquished, vacate the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cai. Cas. 106, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radcliff-v-marine-insurance-co-nysupct-1805.